The Real Dirty Mets Blog


  • Log In



  • MLB Standings

  • Check TRDMB on Facebook

  • Authors

  • Categories







  • Baseball Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory Sports RSSMicro FeedRank Results

Delgado’s Return Delayed - Fuget About Him!

Posted by prismo on 8:11am, Wednesday December 23rd 2009

Na na na na boo boo. You paid me millions last season for nothing!

Marty Noble, of MLB.com, reported last night that Carlos Delgado’s return to playing has been mysteriously delayed. One can only assume that he aggravated an injury or just isn’t ready to play yet, but no details were actually given regarding the delay. However, two members of the Mets’ staff said that Delgado should resume playing in the middle of January.

Carlos played in only 26 games last season after staying healthy throughout his 2008 campaign. He had an incredibly strong finish in 2008, but can we really trust a 37 year old coming off surgery and further injury aggravations to contribute to this year’s team? I realize the Mets are looking for cheap solutions to fill out the roster, but I don’t support more signings of old, injured players. I believe the team needs consistency, and it seems unlikely that Delgado would be able to provide that this season.

Disagree? Think his .929 lifetime OPS is too tempting with the right incentive-filled contract? Voice your (faulty) opinions in the comments!

Oh, and Happy Festivus! Don’t forget to air your grievances and participate in the feats of strength!

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
BallHype: hype it up!

95 Responses to “Delgado’s Return Delayed - Fuget About Him!”

  1. mrose says:

    I agree that for the right incentive laden deal, but its also a matter of places on the roster

  2. CaseStreet says:

    Sorry Carlito, sometime it bes that way, papi.

    Murph in the 7 or 8 hole should be fine. Hopefully, they’ll move on Garko now.

  3. mrose says:

    so i’m assuming no one is working today? Or traveling? Quiet day on the interweb

  4. metsgirl31 says:

    Happy Festivus…LOL…love the Seinfeld reference. “I got a lot of problems with you people.”

  5. fongy2 says:

    fuggetaboutit! Indeed!

    Most know I’m a huge Delgado fan
    but again, it’s time to move on and
    away from seriously aging and oft-injured players, no matter how good
    they once were.
    This was my problem with wasting two
    yrs on Moises (Fongul) Alou AND my
    Problem with even thinking about
    Ben (DL) Sheets.
    This team needs healthy bodies which
    can be counted on to play everyday or
    in SPers cases, every 5th day.

    I’d think Omar understands this by now and with his job hanging in the
    balance, wouldn’t bother with these
    types of long odd bets.
    But then, with Omar…who knows.

    • dirtysanchez says:

      the way this offseason is going fong, id expect to see delgado on a one year deal in 2010

    • njstuckintx says:

      Fongy, I can’t remember if it was you or Wanny who said at this point (based on what’s available) let the kids play (Murph, Fmart, Neise) and save the dollars for next year. I’m thinking that is our best shot as well. If the team some how gels and is within striking distance, I’m sure a move by the trade deadline could be worth it. With the free agent pool being quite deep next year, that seems like a logical plan.

      I still would like having Bay in LF, but if not, we’ll need 2 OF bench players for sure.

      • stickguy says:

        I think that was fongy.

        I agree, but sort of. Get some 1 year contract guys to for support.

        maybe a compromise. Have a couple of vets on the bench (even if you have to overpay them) to balance out the kids.

        Lets say you decide to let Thole have a shot at C, at least have another viable BU guy (I guess santos, coste and Blanco cover that, sort of).

        For LF, let carter, pagan and F Mart compete in the spring for the rotation. Make sure to sign someone like garko or gomes too (pick your vet bat/corner IF/OF guy). Spend some extra on them sinc eyou are saving a ton not signing Bay.

        1B, they already seem to be doing this (murphy), but same deal, get a vet stick to cover your arse.

        then load up on the best SP you can get on ST deals. Garland fits. I also think a 2011 horizon means they should spend the money on Chapman.

        Is it a tought choice really? 1 year of Bay or 5 years of chapman for the same $$?

        • njstuckintx says:

          I lean towards Chapman, myself.

          While having Bay will garner no complaints from me, if Ike is supposed to be a decent bat down the line and has the option to play OF (possibly), next years crop of FA 1B and corner OFs would be able to fill in the power void we have. Flexibility!

          Having Gomes on the bench would be positive. Mets haven’t had a power bat off the bench in some time. In reality, Tatis played that role for the past 2 years, and he doesn’t illicit pictures of homeruns dancing in my head.

        • fongy2 says:

          Yeah, I’m usually in the “win now at any cost”
          bunch,BUT with
          all the guys coming off injuries and being question marks,the lack
          of high level FAs available,
          and me being partial to a
          lot of the kids who I’ve seen the last 3/4 yrs w/Bingo,I’d like to pretty
          much see them sit tight.
          Also,sinc I don’t trust Omar almost at all,I don’t want to see panic moves inorder for him to try and
          save his job..
          Think ScottKazmir.
          I’d be very happy with Bay though!

  6. Kingman 26 says:

    HAHA Prismo!

    Festivus is not over until Jeff pins Fred!

    Happy Festivus to all!!

  7. stickguy says:

    Well, to steal a thought from TRS, if you are going to roll with Murphy anyway as the regular 1B, Delgado is less risky, since if he gets hurt, you are right back where you would have been anyway. So the only thing you really lose (or gain) is the difference in production while he is in there.

    So for that reason at least, a 1 year incentive deal is defensible.

    However, i don’t want him. Not that I don’t think his bat could still have some life, but after these hip and core muscle injuries, I have a hard time believing he will have any mobility at 1B (and the bat speed is no given).

    Combine that with the (ugh) real possibility of Castillo at 2B, 2 old guys with no range on the RS of the IF is not going to be pretty.

    So, I wish Carlos well and hope his career isn’t over, but at this point, he really needs to be a DH.

    Heck, the yankees should have signed him instead of Nick J. Still don’t understand that move.

  8. wannybackstra says:

    Who hasn’t already forgotten about Delgado?

    And I can’t imagine he’ll be able to adequately play 1B after this hip surgery. He had no range to begin with. And judging by ARod’s lack of range after similar surgery I think it is safe to assume that Delgado’s next career move will be as a DH on a bad team trying to get lucky (think Frank Thomas with the Athletics).

  9. royhobbs7 says:

    The Mets 2010 Hot Stove can be summarized thusly:

    They got rid of a PUTZ to get a DICKEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  10. CaseStreet says:

    Come on guys. Carlos, Pedro and El Duque, one more time.

  11. wannybackstra says:

    Mattsblog says the Bravos are close to adding Glaus (I presume to play 1B).

    Glaus is still effective when he’s healthy. He’s just not very effective at staying healthy.

    I’d like the Mets to have Glaus as a semi-regular/insurance policy at 1B with Murphy.

  12. royhobbs7 says:

    I’d place my money on Glaus’ health and productivity before I would place it on Delgado. The Braves know what they are doing. I wouldn’t be surprised if they sign Bay and snakebite us!!!

  13. CaseStreet says:

    So that takes the Braves out of the running for LaRoche.
    Still leaves Mets, A’s, Mariners, Giants, D’Backs, and Rangers.
    He’s not stellar, but he’s a solid role player.

  14. charlie_s says:

    So, that other blog says to throw in the towel on the 2009 Mets season. I just can’t accept that.

    • CaseStreet says:

      First, 2009 was over in June.
      Second, WTF is Hudson going to do for us, and what “figure out what to do with Castillo later” is the dumbest idea,
      Loser Mentality!

    • prismo says:

      “This is why I would prefer to see the Mets abandon signing Bay and Molina or Matt Holliday and Joel Pineiro, give up the idea of a pre-season ticket boom, and focus on building the best possible team for 2009, while allowing for as much flexibility for next winter and beyond.”

      I can’t wait until the Mets are good last season! …wait…what!?

    • CaseStreet says:

      Where would DeRosa play if you have Winn in LF and Hudson at 2B? Is he 1B? Hudson and DeRosa would be as bad as Castillo and Delgado.

      • prismo says:

        Does it surprise you that MC would make a terrible GM? Despite his insistence that the Mets need to have a solid “plan” for the future, he changes his mind about who the Mets should sign at least five times a day.

      • saltygary says:

        Last year DeRosa played mostly at 3rd but also played multiple games at 1b, 2nd LF and RF. So having him back up Murph and platoon in LF isn’t a bad idea.

        My issue is didn’t he have the same surgery Big Papi had? Papi whether there are other issues like weight or steroids hasn’t fared too well since he went under the knife. I’m curious to know other players that had the same treatment and what the turn around time is.

    • saltygary says:

      For those of you that are not ESPN subscribers, this is the Buster Olney piece that Matt the Hack was channeling:

      For the Mets, there are already legitimate questions about whether Jason Bay is the right investment for their ballpark. He is a below-average defender who hits for power and Citi Field is a place where deep fly balls and subpar outfielders will suffer.

      But as the Bay negotiations drag out, there are growing doubts about whether Bay even wants to play for the Mets, in their grand canyon of a park.

      The Mets are aware of all this — and while they still would like to sign Bay very soon, the team is internally mapping out alternative routes in the event that Bay doesn’t embrace their offer.

      And those options include adding depth, rather the one big name, like Bay.

      There is no perfect Cliff Lee or Roy Halladay solution for the Mets, because rival front offices are not lured by their prospects — and because the free-agent market, in general, is weak. But there are a ton of unsigned free agents, and if you have $15 million to $22 million available in cash at this point, you don’t have a lot of competition. You would be like the guy who waits until after Dec. 25 to do his Christmas shopping; the best stuff might be gone, but he will have a lot of choices.

      The key, as one major league official mused on Tuesday night, is picking the right players — using the money the right way. If the Mets come to believe that Bay doesn’t want to play for them, they should go the route of the Seattle Mariners and shape their choices according to their ballpark and build some depth. They could consider a series of moves along these lines:

      1. Make the move for Orlando Hudson, something that the Mets have been dying to do for two years: Luis Castillo had a surprisingly decent season last year, but Hudson is the better player — he drives the ball more (50 extra-base hits last year), and he’s a better defensive player; he scored significantly better than Castillo in the UZR/150 ratings. He’s an energizing force who would be good in the New York clubhouse, and would take pressure off the likes of David Wright and Carlos Beltran in dealing with the New York media. You sign Hudson and then figure out what to do with Castillo, whether it would be eating a significant share of the money owed to him to dump him or simply using him as a part-timer.

      2. Sign a low-cost veteran outfielder, like Randy Winn: He can play multiple outfield positions, he still rates very well in his defense — and this is something you need from your outfielders while playing in a park like Citi Field. The Mariners showed this approach last year with the strong outfield defense they played in Safeco. How much would he cost? Well, the guess here is that Winn doesn’t have a lot of options, and maybe he bites if you dangle a one-year deal for something in the range of $2.5 million. He might not hit for power, but he’ll play good defense, run the bases well, lend some versatility and experience — and you keep flexibility by signing him to a one-year deal. Winn was not a good player for the Giants last season, but he often hit near the top of the San Francisco lineup and more was needed from him than he could provide. With the Mets, he would probably hit at the bottom of the order.

      3. Consider a strong two-year offer to Mark DeRosa: There are concerns among teams about whether DeRosa is going to be effective, as he comes back from a wrist injury. But if the Mets are at least somewhat satisfied that he can be a productive player moving forward, they could outbid the market on a DeRosa deal. He could play first base against left-handed pitchers (with Daniel Murphy starting against right-handers), given his .587 slugging percentage and .928 OPS against lefties last year, and DeRosa could start against right-handers according to the needs of the day — maybe in left field, maybe at third base if David Wright needs a day off, or at second if Hudson or Castillo needed a day off.

      4. Make solid one-year offers to the best strike-throwing relief specialists on the market: Bob Howry held right-handed batters to a .231 on-base percentage last year; maybe he would be that kind of guy. Chan Ho Park held right-handers to a .678 OPS, and seems durable; maybe he would be that kind of guy for the Mets.

      5. Take a look at Jarrod Washburn: Maybe he’s not healthy. Maybe he’s not excited about pitching in New York, in the National League. But he is a fly ball pitcher who threw pretty well for the first four months of last season (check out the month to month totals here), and presumably, he would not be expensive on a one-year contract; if he is, you move on to other options.

      6. Make a solid two-year offer to Fernando Rodney, to strengthen your group of set-up men: It looks like he could be headed to the Angels or the Phillies, but if the Mets got him, he wouldn’t cost a draft pick (unlike Jose Valverde) and the back end of the team’s bullpen could become a strength.

      7. Make solid one-year offers to starting pitchers who might be trying to rebuild their market value, whether it be someone like Brett Myers or Vicente Padilla or Jon Garland.

      8. If you like Joel Pineiro, make an offer that you’re comfortable with: If Pineiro — the best starting pitcher still unsigned — wants more than what you’re offering, then you move on to other pitchers. There is volume in this current market.

      A key in all of these moves is flexibility. If the Mets don’t sign Bay, they should look for very short-term obligations, one-year or two-year deals, to keep themselves in position to make bids next winter, when the free-agent crop will be better. The advantage for the Mets now is that they still have a good core of players who will presumably have better luck in staying healthy this year — Johan Santana, David Wright, Jose Reyes, Carlos Beltran and Francisco Rodriguez.

      What they do not need is a long-term investment in Bay if he doesn’t want to play for them; the last thing the Mets can afford now is to have a reluctant $16 million player. If they don’t get an answer soon, they should move on and take advantage of the fact they’re one of the few teams with a nice chunk of change to spend.

      • saltygary says:

        As much as I would live Hudson on the team, Castillo would need to go first. How would the Mets have any leverage trying to get rid of him in a trade if there are 2 second baseman signed.

        Not the biggest Winn fan but I agree that the Bay thing is taking too long. Ultimatum time.

        I do agree that the team needs to be put in a more flexible position with cash and players. The more crap they can get off the books the better chance they can get in on another Santana or Doc H type of trade.

      • 1). Hudson is an “energizing force?” When he isn’t energizing himself to the DL he’s energizing himself to the bench. He won a gold glove despite negative fielding last year because he gives good interviews and the press (Olney is a member of said press) like him.

        2). Love the idea of Winn. Gotta hope last year was an aberration and not the end of the line though.

        3). DeRosa makes a lot of sense. He seemingly could fill in if needed everywhere but CF and C, but a glance at Fangraphs shows that except in RF he would do so negatively. Would he accept the role of part-time 1B, back up everywhere else with this Mets team?

        4). Agree completely on the bullpen needing veterans, and on the 1 year offer concept. I believe this should have been # 1 because it’s Olney’s best suggestion.

        5). The idea of a veteran fly-ball SP is one I’ve advocated the whole offseason, like the bullpen idea it makes perfect sense to me.

        6). Rodney scares me. High ERA and WHIP and a ground ball pitcher when not striking batters out. I’d pass.

        7). Whether Lackey/Halladay came here or not this idea made sense. Now it’s rather mandatory.

        8). I don’t trust Pineiro as far as I can throw him to be productive away from Dave Duncan. Just say no to Pineiro. It rhymes, even Omar can remember that.

      • CaseStreet says:

        this doesn’t seem too bad, though I do disagree with Hudson.

  15. metsfan4decades says:

    How in the world can MC have the #1 Mets blog and be associated with SNY? He has got to be the biggest bipolar Met fan I’ve ever read. One minute he’s freaking out, the next he’s calm, then he’s all in for Bay, next he’s saying skip it. It’s like riding a roller coaster with this guy.

    On the other hand, the complete opposite is Ted Berg over at his blog on TedQuarters. I faithfully read his Met posts and he often makes very good points, such as his latest in Glimmer of Hope. Here at least is a guy that knows baseball, seemingly is very knowledgeable about all things Mets, and his posts often relay that knowledge…..

    • I agree completely. Berg is the multiple Pulitzer prize winner of Met bloggers, that other place is more like Mad Libs written by a 6th grade dropout who doesn’t have sense of humor.

    • fongy2 says:

      That domain name is the biggest factor!
      As much as he grates on me,
      it was a great idea.
      Saltygary’s post above,b/t/w
      is good but,There are guys i’d like but for various reasons are too much of a risk
      right now for us. I really like DeRosa but that wrist problem could be real iffy as
      to what,when and how he returns.Rodney’s past history of various arm issues and not
      very good job as a closer scare me.Washburn is iffy as
      well. He pitched his way out of The Angels rotation yrs ago and was just flat out bad
      for The Mariners until last season when in his walk yr,suddenly remembered how to Pitch again.Plus, he wasn’t great as I recall for The Tigers after the deal there.
      Winn is done as a player.
      No power,not much of a hitter overall,not much of a speed threat anymore and can’t really play CF anymore,just LF&RF.A waste of a roster space.Pagan&Sullivan are better players at this point.
      We’re stuck w/Castillo, so forget other Secondbasemen…
      Thanks, Omar!!
      I just don’t see much out there thats really gonna help
      us a whole lot and would prefer Omar not throw the
      money away as you know better guys will become available during the season.
      They always do!

    • Mr North Jersey says:

      I read the glimmer of hope article and it was a good read but I disagree with one aspect of it.

      He says “The Mets, not nearly as likely to make a title run in 2010, should not be making that sort of gamble.” referring to bringing in a Javier Vasquez type of pitcher if it meant trading away a Jenrry Mejia type player.

      In my opinion the Mets are either committed to trying to win in 2010 or not. If they feel that they just don’t have the horses to win in 2010 then they need to plan accordingly and not sign a retread has been one year project and build for down the road.

      To me that means investing in young arms like a chapman instead. and giving the Baby Mets a chance to see if they are part of our future. Players like Thole and Santos and Murphy and Niese for starters at least.

      That also means if the Mets bringing back Jerry was a big mistake because if anything Jerry has not been the nuturing teacher type of manager to say the least.

      You can’t have it both ways you either believe this team is 1 or 2 players away from winning this year or not.

      If not then ok build for 2011 by not signing a Molina to a 3 year deal.

      • Mr North Jersey says:

        For the record I felt the Mets were but a few players away from competing for a Title.

        I always felt if Minaya had signed Lackey and Holliday or let’s say If he could of worked out a trade that got us an Arroyo and Phillips from the Reds plus signed Bay. We would be serious contenders for a title in 2010.

        In my opinion of course.

  16. mrose says:

    oh man, MC’s latest post about his ” all decade team” read the comments and his 1b choice

    • saltygary says:

      I just came here to post the same thing. if his 1b choice doesn’t take 100% of his credibility away I don’t know what does. And I know RF has been bad but Bell as the best.

      At least he detailed how we got to these conclusions “i like to do these lists without looking at stats,”

      • fongy2 says:

        Jesus Christmas!
        I’ve read some stupid things there BUT that
        might be tops!
        It really does say all you need to know
        about The Blognazi himself!

        • mrose says:

          the thing about it for me, is when I think of Mets 1b’s over the past 10… I think of Zeile and Delgado and because its recent, Murph…

          I forget MientkefeakIzigiga even played here and i’d like to keep it that way :)

          Same with DBell

          • saltygary says:

            The only reason why I remember Bell was it was funny that he lived on a house boat by the stadium. But overall he was a pain in the ass and didn’t contribute anything.

            Mancaveitch had one ok season. He was banged up most of the time and was a baby about playing time.

            I guess people should be thankful that he didn’t have John Olerud or Hubie Brooks on his 2000 list.

      • Mr North Jersey says:

        MC and Doug shared a moment that no other Met 1st baseman ever had.

        Ahhhhh, :-)

        My fav at 1st has to be Keith followed by Brogna

        My fav at 2nd has to be Backman

        My fav at 3rd has to be HOJO

        My fav at SS has to be Reyes

        My fav at C is tough but I have to say is Hundley

        My fav at LF is easy the Silent Assassin Kevin McReynolds

        My fav at CF has to be the man they call Nails Lenny Dykstra

        My fav at RF has to be the Strawman

  17. Mr North Jersey says:

    So DeRosa was offered a 2 year 12 million contract by the Giants.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.